Sometimes Critter is more smart than Houdini

lilmafya at 12h22
04
Feb
2012
Sometimes Critter is more smart than Houdini

I was curious to check if engines understand that this position is a draw or not, to humans it doesn't take more than 2-3 seconds to understand that its a forced draw position, but I realizied that stockfish , Houdini and many other engines evaluate it much wrong like +17 or +20
while critter 1.4 , for now is the only engine that gave result as 0.00 or 0.05.

About
This topic belongs to the forum
  • Chess2U is a place to discuss and share anything related to Computer Chess! So you will need Chess2U to keep up with Chess progress!

  • Numbers of topics : 5570
  • Numbers of messages : 32114
  • Numbers of users : 2484
  • Numbers of points : 3188
Similar topics
Hi all, Critter 1.2 is as strong as Houdini 1.5a in long time control (both 64 bits with SSE4 support). TimeControl "5400+30" Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz Opening book: Masterbook 3.2^13 ^10 hash size: 1024M, The
http://www.vlasak.biz/critter/
Processor i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHZ hash size: 1024M, opening book: Masterbook TimeControl "5400+30" [img][/img] Arrière Pensée http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=22194;pg=2 ~~~~~ Given that this was found on rybk
Critter 1.2 64-bit (new) vs. Critter 1.01 64-bit Time Control: 1 Minutes Critter 1.2 64-bit - Critter 1.01 64-bit 49.0 - 31.0 (80: +32, =34, -14) 61.25% Perf = +79 Elo ( 61.2% TP = +79 Elo 68%->[+51,+112] 95%->[+24,+146]
Houdini has a problem with this item. The best move is L: h5 or Lg4 Only 0.9 critter is located. Maybe I am too weak processor? Please test yours. http://img215.imageshack.us/i/magicalsnap201102222219.png/
Forums from same category
See also
more_less
Informations

1 Replies For the topic :
"Sometimes Critter is more smart than Houdini"

This topic has been viewed 332 times.

Last message :
04/02/2012 at 12h22 by "lilmafya"